Thursday, December 27, 2007

Our Learning Curve

Some have asked about what we have been doing in our core group and I wanted to make sure that everyone was updated on our activities and discussions. We have been reading through Roger Greenway's book, Cities: Missions' New Frontier, in order for our entire core group to get on the same page in our understanding of the importance of the city, the dynamics involved in urban ministry, what the Bible says about urban ministry and urban churches, and what are the various approaches we might take in order to renew the city of Denver spiritually, socially, and culturally. From our reading and discussions, we have entered in a steadily increasing learning curve, in that we are beginning to make decisions and formulate a more solid ministry approach. Below are some notes from one of our discussions:

The spread of the Gospel and expansion of the church occurred in the context of cities; the cities of the early church were not much different than ours today spiritually, culturally, or socially.

This work was not done by isolated individuals (‘lone rangers’), but was accomplished through team efforts; Paul and Barnabas (with Silas, John Mark, Timothy, etc.), Peter and John (with the other 10 disciples); often Christians focus on the heroes of the faith as if they did it all alone

But how did they accomplish this? Are there models and principles for us to learn from?
-This is an especially important question since Jesus’ command to go and make disciples of the entire known world (Matt. 28:18-20; Acts 1:8) was carried out by the early church in one generation! In other words, in less than one person’s lifetime, Christianity had permeated everywhere!! They did this with no technology, no seminaries, no church buildings, no youth groups, etc.!
-Furthermore, Paul stated explicitly that he regarded his way of life and ministry as a model for others to follow (1 Thessalonians 3:9); what was his way of life and ministry model?

-With all of the needs and different cultural groups prevalent in our city, what must head the list of things to be done? In other words, using the Bible, where do we begin in obeying Jesus?
1. The disciples went to and stayed in cities to spread the Gospel and develop early communities of faith.
2. These early Christians focused on making disciples, or that everyone in every city needed to be converted to faith and enrolled in continuing, active discipleship (apprenticeship). They would then be baptized and seek membership in Christ’s visible body on earth (what we know as the church).
3. Paul’s approach to urban missions was centered on families and their social/relational networks.
§ Oikos: Is in a range of Greek words based on the idea of home or household. It is used to refer to the houses people live in and the homes that churches met in, as well as the fact that believers all belong to the household of God. But the usage goes beyond a house with a white-picket fence or the nuclear family. At times, a person’s oikos is the fundamental natural unit of society: one’s family, friends, neighbors, and associates.
§ In more urban and suburban societies, people do not build their social lives around family but instead around homogeneous interests. Is this true for us in Denver?
§ Who are in each of our oikos? List them out!

-What can Pauline mission strategy teach us about evangelism through extended families and households? In other words, what kind of effects did this strategy produce?
§ The Gospel spread and the church expanded through the conversion of individuals and their ‘households’ (oikos); e.g. Cornelius and his household (Acts 10); the jailer at Philippi (Acts 16:31-33); a woman at Philippi (Acts 16:15); Jason and his household in Thessalonica (Acts 17:5-9); Crispus and his household in Corinth (Acts 18:8); through the household of Titus (Acts 18:7); other households where Paul spread the Gospel and made converts/disciples (1 Cor. 1:15-16; Col. 4:15; Philemon 2).
§ The fact that entire oikos or households were converted changed entire cultures
§ Common cultural barriers were struck at the communion table, where master and slave, women and men, Jew and Gentile sat together around a common table and celebrated the same salvation.
§ These were covenant communities, committed to God and each other (Gal. 6:10; Eph. 2:19)


-IMPORTANT IDEA: The holistic approach to missions and evangelism taken in this book neither restricts the definition of sin and evil to individual conduct nor limits urban ministry to personal and family matters. The societal dimensions of what needs to be done in the city are readily acknowledged, as is the importance of ministries for community development and the promotion of social justice. But at the same time the holistic perspective on urban mission recognizes that nothing is more crucial for social change in the city than the conversion of persons, families, and groups to evangelical Christianity.

-Thus far, according to the Bible, the pattern for ‘church planting’ was: 1) to go to and remain in urban areas, 2) share the Gospel message, 3) provide urban dwellers the opportunity to follow and serve Jesus in obedience (repent, believe, & be baptized), 4) to share the same Gospel message and provide the same opportunity for discipleship to their oikos or households, and 5) to gather these new disciples to form a community of faith, or church. (Disciple-making first, church comes second)

-Individual conversion=Conversion of their family & social networks=Transformation of cultural practices & customs=Renewal of city!

-Theologian Lesslie Newbigin rightly says, “The Church is sent into the world to continue to that which He came to do, in the power of the same Spirit, reconciling people to God” (John 20:19-23).
-Adolf Harnack, a German church historian stated, “We cannot hesitate to believe that the great mission of Christianity was in reality accomplished by means of informal missionaries.”


BRYAN’S QUESTIONS AND REFLECTIONS
1. Do you think that Paul’s urban mission strategy is still relevant for cities today?
§ If so, how can we implement it for the expansion of Denver Mosaic Church?
§ If not, what needs to be adapted or changed for today’s culture?
2. Who are each of our households/oikos? What are some ways that we can intentionally expose them or introduce them to the Gospel?
3. What does it look like to become a disciple? In other words, what are their basic behaviors, attitudes, activities, relationships, use of time, energy, and money?
4. How can we (Denver Mosaic Church) develop disciples? What is an intentional process to move a lost person to becoming an apprentice/disciple for Jesus?

1 comment:

Lisa of Longbourn said...

"They did this with no technology, no seminaries, no church buildings, no youth groups, etc.!"
- Good point!

I've sometimes wished to do a Bible study of the evangelism methods employed in Acts: who, what, when, where, how...

At one point you said, "They would then be baptized and seek membership in Christ’s visible body on earth (what we know as the church)." Where does the Bible teach about church membership? I always understood that once you were saved, you were the object of Paul's assertion in Ephesians, "For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones."

I believe that "renewal of city" includes delight in transcending homogeneous interests, building community between different groups (like you said about the Communion Table). How is that facilitated/encouraged in the "church model" you describe?

I may be weird, but I don't feel like I have that much influence in my "interest groups." But in my family, where we are talking regularly and the decisions I make pave the way for furture generations, the impact is bigger. I guess I'm asking whether this church model exchanges interest group evangelism for family evangelism?
To God be all glory,
Lisa
Denver Mosaic Childcare :P